A growing number of people who have “sex changes” have huge regrets about that decision but a judge in England is blocking attempts to study why transgenderism is wrecking so many lives.

A United Kingdom judge ruled in favor of a university that blocked a psychotherapist’s proposal to research why so many of his transgender patients regretted their transitions.

James Caspian fought in court Bath Spa University’s decision to block his research proposal (for his Master’s degree), according to a report on a Christian radio station in England.

Caspian lost in a lower court and then lost on appeal. He has counseled sex-change patients for eight years and he wanted to study the facts about why many of them regretted their decisions for hormone treatment and surgery.

The university said no because they feared the results of the study could draw protests from transgender activists. Apparently, university officials were concerned that the study would be politically incorrect and cast doubt on whether someone can actually change their sex.

Caspian said some people have tried to reverse the transition back to their true gender because the sex-change process was so traumatizing. He has lectured on the dangers of “gender reassignment.”

Caspian may continue his legal appeals. The judge threw the case out due to the timing of the filing.

This points out two problems. First, universities should be searching for truth and not stopping studies because the findings might conflict with their bias. Secondly, this action deters counseling professionals who see the wreckage resulting from “sex changes” from speaking out for the benefit of others who might be lured into these decisions without adequate warning.

Caspian was approached by 50 people who wanted their true gender back in 2017. Gender reassignment is a lie and public needs to understand that.