It was with some satisfaction that a story appeared on January 24 that Gov. Kevin Stitt of Oklahoma had issued an executive order to deny state-paid travel of employees and officials to the State of California. This was in response to such a ban imposed by officials of the City of San Francisco (San Fransicko) to ban such travel to Oklahoma ostensibly because of legislation in our legislature deemed anti-abortion. It should be noted that there are a few exceptions allowed, such as athletic teams and necessary government business such as advertising the state or negotiating state business with industry.
Most of us who remember San Francisco in its glory days before the illegal alien invasion brought it down to its present debilitated status as homeless invasion and the resulting destruction of the beauty and safety feeling that once made it one of the most desired places to be a tourist. It should be noted that the political make-up of the local and state governments are virtually all Democrat. (Note: the true original name of the political party now seemingly in control of those in the C/F/S camp has no “ic” in it.) It is my contention that the use of the word “democratic,” which is an adjective, by both party officials and major media, has become constant as a way to confuse and attract uninformed voters who, in my experience “want to be democratic.” Their public education was, like most of those born after World War II, misguided to the point of being somewhat worthless
While it is probably true that there will be other reactions from there, including the Capitol, it seems to me that Gov. Stitt has adopted the right approach to those wanna-be dictators, since the only thing those of that persuasion seem to have respect for is those who will not passively let them get away with their aggressive quest for more and more power over other people and governments. Frankly, it seems to me to be no great loss to Oklahoma to have any similar entity issue similar bans as we don’t need their types to come here and disrupt our way of life.
Actually there is, in my opinion, an even more important factor in the actions of Governor Stitt, and also PRESDT-45, that if carried on continuously could serve the population extremely well and begin to get this massive ship of state started to turn around from the several decades of increasingly downward plunge we have seen.
Frankly, if that doesn’t happen it seems most likely that the USA will cease to exist as the “representative republic” established with the preparation and ratification by the States of the Constitution in 1787. Instead, those still surviving will – if the Democrats
in control of their party get what they seem to want – be living under a total dictatorship Communist conspiracy as bad, or worse, than that which brought about World War II under the Nazis’ violent repression in Germany.
As a minor alternative, those states remaining in control of freedom loving, God-worshiping and rule-of-law-abiding management could spin off and maintain the form of government, but on a smaller scale. They probably would exist under constant threat of invasion by the others, as history has recorded.
However, in the Constitution, Article IV, Section 3 provides that “no new state shall be formed or erected within the jurisdiction of any other state; nor any state be formed by the junction of two or more states, or parts of states, without the consent of the legislatures of the states concerned as well as the Congress.” That clause should slow down the rumored move of some counties being invited to transfer from Virginia to West Virginia, or some in Northern California forming a new State.
The whole thing could be defused if more officials would act like PRESDT-45 and seemingly Governor Stitt and take action to shut down those performing the violent and destructive actions that seem to be becoming more and more evident as the rioters are allowed to “blow off their steam” and are not rounded up. And if aliens are not removed from our national property and not incarcerated. Far too many of the more local governments have been shown to be too lenient to the point of appearing sympathetic.