After the U.S. Supreme Court legalized “homosexual marriage,” it was inevitable that forced acceptance of these perverted relationships would negatively impact children.

Now, the liberal Oklahoma Supreme Court has made another decision in line with the Homosexual Agenda that grants special rights to nonbiological homosexual parents who get divorced.

Acting on a case from Tulsa, the liberal Oklahoma Supreme Court ruled that a homosexual parent could get custody, visitation and support of a minor child.

Two women in Tulsa were in a homosexual relationship. One decided to get pregnant through artificial insemination and had a child. Then the two women separated.

The woman who didn’t have the baby wanted the same rights as a divorced biological father or mother. The biological mother wanted to protect her child from this other woman and denied visitation.

Biological ties to children used to be important.

But not in Oklahoma City.

“Consistent with the best interests of children in similar scenarios, we hold that non-biological same-sex parents may attain complete parity with biological parents,” the liberal Oklahoma Supreme Court stated in an 8-1 ruling.

So, this court feels that it is best for this child to spend time with a mother who is not her mother but is at odds with her real mother. The ruling is an affirmation that the court feels that the public must accept homosexuality as “normal” and grant special rights to people caught up in this lifestyle.

Never mind that the opinion of the Oklahoma Court of Civil Appeals and the Tulsa County District Court was just the opposite.

Of course, the attorney for the plaintiff was Tulsan Chris Brecht, who is married to another man and is vice president of the board of Oklahomans for Equality.

The farther that our culture and legal system goes to embrace homosexuality, the harder it will be to protect these children. We are going to lose a generation.