If anyone should be concerned about ending hunger throughout the world, it should be the United Nations. Right?

Apparently not.

In 2021, a professor in the University of Hawaii political science department, wrote “The Benefits of World Hunger” and it was presented by the UN.

After it went viral, it was pulled.

He wrote, “We sometimes talk about hunger in the world as if it were a scourge that all of us want to see abolished, viewing it as comparable with the plague or aids. But that naïve view prevents us from coming to grips with what causes and sustains hunger. Hunger has great positive value to many people.

“Indeed, it is fundamental to the working of the world’s economy. Hungry people are the most productive people, especially where there is need for manual labor.”

If people aren’t hungry, they wouldn’t perform low-paying jobs, he contends.

“…For those of us at the high end of the social ladder, ending hunger globally would be a disaster,” he wrote. “If there were no hunger in the in the world, who would plow the fields? Who would harvest our vegetables? Who would work in the rendering plants? Who would clean our toilets? We would have to produce our own food and clean our toilets. No wonder people at the high end are not rushing to solve the hunger problem. For many of us, hunger is not a problem, but an asset.”

This is what happens when a world government is created.

God help America if we ever surrender our sovereignty to this people.